The web has just
suffered a collective head rush on the news that Apple has sold 37.04
million iPhones, a doubling of sales from the previous quarter.
Spectacular Android destroying stuff!
Or is it really? Let's
have a wee look, shall we?
Using Apple's own
earning statements for the last 15 months, and beginning with Q4 2010
as a base from which to work, we can put that performance into some
perspective. If you get bored with figures and such, you might want
to skip to the next bit, but if you're brave enough to follow the
bouncing ball, the journey is enlightening.
Sep 2010 Q4 – 14.10 M
Dec 2010 Q1 – 16.24 M
– 115.5% (increased)
Mar 2011 Q2 – 18.60 M
– 114.5% (increased)
Jun 2011 Q3 – 20.34 M
– 109.0% (increased)
Sep
2011 Q4 – 17.07 M – 84.0% (decreased)
Dec 2011 Q1 – 37.04 M
– 217% (increased)
For starters, the
December quarter contains 92 days, so the daily numbers for the
iPhone are the total for the quarter, 37.04 million, divided by the
number of days, 92, which comes out at 402,000 sales each day. Bear
in mind that this is the best single quarter by far that the iPhone
has achieved, yet it's a little more than half the daily rate of
Android sales of which more than 700,000 a day were being seen back
in October. So it's not unreasonable to speculate that the daily rate
is now North of 800,000 which means that the iPhone's most
spectacular daily feat was likely still only half of Android's daily
effort.
So not much chance of
Apple wrenching the crown from Android anytime soon then. Yet with
all the static hurtling about the web at present, you'd swear that
Apple had achieved some game changing miracle. Don't these people
think for even a moment before they unquestioningly parrot the
disingenuous utterings of Apple's PR machine? Apparently not. So
Apple's share price gets the boost that its shareholders and senior
executives so desperately want.
Looking at the figures
above, you'll notice that the quarter to quarter figures are all over
the place but most noticeably, the Q4 number, instead of increasing,
actually decreased. Why was that? Mostly because Apple broke its
usual June iPhone release pattern and made the faithful wait another
quarter if they wanted the latest and greatest. Which, of course,
they did.
So sales in Q4, instead
of increasing by a substantial figure, actually dropped and in doing
so, created an artificially low base figure for comparison to the
following quarter. The net effect of that has been to make the Q1
2012 figures look iFabulous to the iFaithful and those who couldn't
be arsed thinking about it for a moment. And that my friends, is
many.
It's impossible to know
what percentage increase Q4 would have seen had the iP4S been
launched at the normal (for Apple) cycle period of Q3, but we can
make an educated guess. And to save you the trouble, I've done it for
you. I'm kind like that.
I averaged the quarter
by quarter increases (though as pointed out earlier, the percentages
fluctuate for no apparent reason) as this seems to be the fairest
way. So, the average increase is a very healthy 128% increase
per quarter.
Applying that to Q3 is
as follows: 20.34 x 128% = 26.0 M. A lot more than the 17.07
M reported, eh?
Then applying the same
to our new figure for Q3... 26.0 x 128% gives us 33.3 M.
So without the freaky
base quarter where buying slowed in anticipation of the Q1 iP4S
release, you would have expected around 33.3* million iPhones to have
been sold. Apple's newly released figure is of course 37.04, around
3.74 million more than might have been expected. And that, gentle
AndroidNZ readers, is just 11.2%. A great deal of hysteria over a
rather modest improvement.
Especially as Apple's
December quarter is traditionally its best anyway. So the purchase
deferral in Q4 had the effect, predicted regularly at the time, of
lowering sales a lot with the additional effect of creating an
artificially low point of comparison with what was always going to be
a huge quarter for the iPhone, the holiday season – this coupled to
the pent-up demand certainly made a difference. But was that 11%
improvement really as spectacular as the analysts and bloggers seem
to believe?
I don't think so.
And just to make the point even clearer, while Apple sold 37 million
iPhones, Samsung – just one of the iPhone maker's many Android
competitors - sold 36.5 million smartphones on its own,
missing Apple's best shot by a minimal half a million units.
According to Strategy Analytics, that gives Apple 23.9% of the
smartphone market in Q4. So, lopping off a few percent for the RIM,
WinPhone, Nokia and Bada folk, that means Android cleaned up, yet
again, with around 60%, nearly
treble the sales of its major rival.
So all that whoopin'
and a'hollerin' by the iFans as they salivate at the notion of iOS
taking over as king of the smartphone OSes seems to be just a gnat's
premature. Of course we don't have actual figures for the latest
quarter from Android as yet, so it's hard to tell precisely how they
fared. But based on the foregoing, I doubt it will worry the little
green robot much.
And somebody needs to
remind the 'Muricans out there that the world is bigger than the US
of A, and Apple getting a single quarter of being neck and neck with
Android in that particular market during a “perfect storm” of
circumstances surely doesn't imply that the balance has changed.
Or does it? It'll be
interesting to see the results from the next quarter, n'est pas?
*Disclaimer: I ain't
no statistician, so don't yell at me if I busted some protocol or
other...
Source:
Apple, Samsung & Strategy Analytics
Yeah cos comparing the iPhone 4S numbers with Android phones costing up to 5 times less is really worthwhile huh?
ReplyDeleteThis article has manipulated the figures just as much as Apple may have done.
ReplyDeleteRather more balance and less Apple bashing would have made the point much stronger that iOS market share is past its peak and can only go down in the medium term.
@Anonymous #1
ReplyDeleteA couple of points - the Apple numbers include all iPhone models, not just the 4S, and secondly, many of those Android phones cost more than iPhones. You'll have seen in the post that Samsung alone sold within half a million units of Apple's total for the quarter and their big sellers are the Galaxy S, S2 and Nexus - none of those are budget phones.
So yes, worthwhile I think.
Thanks for your comment all the same, and welcome to AndroidNZ.
R2
@Anonymous #2
ReplyDeleteI believe you misunderstood the intent of my post.
Rather than bashing Apple, which does what all mega-corporates do - spins its results to look as good to share markets and consumers as possible - my intention was to point out the unquestioning "doubled market share" mantra repeated in the media and blogosphere.
The figures I use add counterpoint in the admittedly vain hope that maybe there'll be some critical appraisal rather than uncritical parroting occasionally.
As to the figures, my methodology is clear as are my sources, but if you see a flaw in either, I'll be happy to discuss.
Assuming you're a different Anonymous to the first commenter, then thanks also for your comments and welcome to AndroidNZ.
R2
I don't think the average price difference between Android and iOS devices matters as much as you think, at least not if you are looking at number of users overall. Google makes money from the vast number of Android users, not from handset sales.
ReplyDeleteIn fairness, I must update this with the Canalys numbers I've posted today, Saturday at 17.30 NZST. Their figures state that Android finished the year with 48.4% smartphone market share, while iPhone managed 19.1%
ReplyDeleteI was off by 6% in Android's favour when you compare the percentage points between the two platforms, though in my defence, the point of my post still stands with Android growing 244% YoY vs iPhone growing 96% YoY.
Even comparing the fourth calendar quarter results, Android creamed it again with 51% versus 23% market share, equating to 148.7% growth against the iPhone's 128%.
But as I mentioned at the conclusion of my post, the March quarter will be a fairer representation of the true state of the game.
R2