Following the recent loss gainst HTC, a UK court has thrown out Apple’s
claim that its iPad design was illegally copied by Galaxy Tab maker, Samsung.
The judge found that the design of Samsung’s three Tab devices doesn’t infringe
Apple’s “registered” design, and ruled that consumers are unlikely to confuse
them with the iPad.
Following the judgement, Samsung
released a statement slamming Apple for its anticompetitive tactics, claiming… “Should
Apple continue to make excessive legal claims in other countries based on such
generic designs, innovation in the industry could be harmed and consumer choice
unduly limited”.
And in response, though not
specifically addressing this most recent failure, Apple’s spokesperson wrote… “It’s
no coincidence that Samsung’s latest products look a lot like the iPhone and
iPad. This kind of blatant copying is wrong and, as we’ve said many times
before, we need to protect Apple’s intellectual property.”
Given the judge had just completed
a comprehensive dismantling of Apple’s demonstrably flimsy case against its Korean
competitor, the Cupertino tech titan looks to be in an advanced state of
denial. Two back-to-back losses in the UK in about as many days certainly don’t
look promising for a victory in the imminent patent battle in Germany.
Even Florian Mueller, notable
Apple suck-up and anti-Android patent junkie, has allowed that Apple’s German
hopes are looking grim. Not that it will prevent the iDevice vendor from
appealing adverse verdicts, or starting new suits against ever more recent
Andoid devices like Samsung’s SGS3. After all, they have much to gain if they
fluke a successful ban here or there, and they have the industry’s deepest
pockets to fund their marketing by litigation campaigns.
In an ironic twist, the
hipster-gratifying iPad’s superior “cool-osity” factor seems to have worked
against Apple, the judge noting that Galaxy tablets “do not have the same
understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design,” adding… “They are not as
cool.” And he
further found that Samsung’s products were distinctive because they were “thinner” and the backs had “unusual
details”.
Apple has 21 days to lodge an
appeal.
Source: Bloomberg
"It’s no coincidence that Samsung’s latest products look a lot like the iPhone"
ReplyDeletelol
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteShould've previewed that reply before posting it - typos for Africa...
DeleteTake 2:
That phrase is Apple's canned response to every legal decision it's quizzed about. It seems to be following the axiom of a well-known propagandist of an earlier world-domination-hungry organisation that reads something like... "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it."
In some quarters of the 'net, there are people who actually believe Apple's claims of "copying" so one assumes that the technique still works. :-)
Cheers,
R2